Interesting article on the election count from Michigan:
Quote:
”McBroom closed his eyes and took a heavy breath. “These are good people, and they’re being lied to, and they’re believing the lies,” he said. “And it’s really dangerous.”
could not read the entire thing as it would not come up...but did get to the part where it said "significant acts of fraud"....just where in our elections laws does it say we have to abide by any acts of fraud. Not to mention little things like poll watchers not being allowed to do their jobs, video evidence of several poll places having their glass covered over, all the rest that time and time again is passed on as just voting business as usual.
mcfarmer,
This deserves post of the decade!
The most secure election in history and people have been convinced it was the completely opposite.
Similar to how they have been convinced the current climate optimum is a climate crisis.
The saddest thing is that both continue unabated, with the believers only believing new information that confirms what the high priests in their cult tell/told them.
Related threads:
By metmike - March 17, 2021, 1:07 p.m.
Wonderful discussion here:
The truth about voter fraud:
https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/The%20Truth%20About%20Voter%20Fraud.pdf
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Mike Lindell
Started by metmike - May 13, 2021, 12:16 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/69324/
mikelindells election tape
11 responses |
Started by mcfarm - Feb. 6, 2021, 8:58 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/65299/
Election Fraud in Ga
29 responses |
Started by TimNew - Dec. 5, 2020, 5:14 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62268/
oh boy! more vote-switching "evidence"
9 responses |
Started by GunterK - Jan. 4, 2021, 10:02 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/63755/
Umm, we have a major problem here: "Trump Pressured GA Secretary of State to 'Find' Votes"
15 responses |
Started by WxFollower - Jan. 3, 2021, 8:28 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/63694/
Chart reading and the Election line chart for Wisconsin/Michigan
16 responses |
Started by rockitck - Dec. 27, 2020, 11:23 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/63393/
is this where we have come to as a country?
17 responses |
Started by mcfarm - Dec. 19, 2020, 8:07 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/63002/
forensic analysis of Dominiion software
4 responses |
Started by GunterK - Dec. 15, 2020, 11:02 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62756/
Wisconsin case: Trump side didn't think it was worth calling even a single witness.
2 responses |
Started by WxFollower - Dec. 14, 2020, 3:21 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62730/
Election Fraud in Ga
29 responses |
Started by TimNew - Dec. 5, 2020, 5:14 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62268/
Sedition Defined
14 responses |
Started by joj - Dec. 12, 2020, 2:39 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62603/
latest on the election
8 responses |
Started by GunterK - Dec. 12, 2020, 7:46 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62634/
mail in ballots explained again
6 responses |
Started by mcfarm - Dec. 13, 2020, 7:40 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62662/
supremes turn back Texas challenge
15 responses |
Started by mcfarm - Dec. 11, 2020, 7:31 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62596/
Dominion spokesperson says....
7 responses |
Started by GunterK - Dec. 8, 2020, 8:29 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62426/
Hi Mike
26 responses |
Started by wglassfo - Dec. 8, 2020, 12:26 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62389/
Election Fraud in Ga
29 responses |
Started by TimNew - Dec. 5, 2020, 5:14 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62268/
Is there a there there
5 responses |
Started by wglassfo - Dec. 7, 2020, 4:40 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62373/
the election.... "death by a thousand cuts"
13 responses |
Started by GunterK - Dec. 3, 2020, 1:10 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62128/
more anomolies explained
6 responses |
Started by mcfarm - Dec. 6, 2020, 5:18 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62320/
Votes manipulated
22 responses |
Started by wglassfo - Dec. 1, 2020, 5:40 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62042/
send all others home and then count the fake ballots?
9 responses |
Started by mcfarm - Dec. 3, 2020, 10:35 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62206/
Greetings from Dominion.... all is well
4 responses |
Started by GunterK - Dec. 3, 2020, 11:16 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62142/
Lin Wood Sidney Powell
Started by wglassfo - Dec. 2, 2020, 11:17 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62122/
Fraud or perjury
6 responses |
Started by wglassfo - Dec. 2, 2020, 6:58 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62105/
dominion
5 responses |
Started by mcfarm - Dec. 2, 2020, 10:45 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62081/
Georgia GOP Election Official Speaks Out
Started by joj - Dec. 2, 2020, 5:13 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62096/
Chris Krebs Speaks Out
12 responses |
Started by joj - Dec. 1, 2020, 7:05 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62024/
Votes manipulated
22 responses |
Started by wglassfo - Dec. 1, 2020, 5:40 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62042/
reasons to wonder about the fruad
12 responses |
Started by mcfarm - Nov. 29, 2020, 8:42 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/61936/
Why this election was a fraud
24 responses |
Started by wglassfo - Nov. 26, 2020, 10:21 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/61803/
Re: Re: Capitol Insurrection News
By metmike - Jan. 27, 2021, 9:55 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/64730/#64841
The most ironic thing is that I was able to find 10 times more fraud in previously elections, than everybody else combined in this election..............
All because I used legit sources and one side has been gullible here, since the election allegation scheme has perpetrated fraud on some good people who believe it because they want to believe it."
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/67047/#67106
I was always in support of Trump making LEGAL challenges to the results:
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62389/#62501
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62389/#62549
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62128/#62358
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
And again, I have pointed out LEGIT, proven fraud here numerous times
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/61115/#61121
Re: Re: Re: Poll - Who won the Election?
0 likes
By metmike - Nov. 11, 2020, 7:24 p.m.
A Sampling of Recent Election Fraud Cases from Across the United States
The Heritage Foundation’s Election Fraud Database presents a sampling of recent proven instances of election fraud from across the country. This database is not an exhaustive or comprehensive list. It does not capture all cases and certainly does not capture reported instances that are not investigated or prosecuted. It is intended to demonstrate the vulnerabilities in the election system and the many ways in which fraud is committed. In addition to diluting the votes of legitimate voters, fraud can have an impact in close elections, and we have many close elections in this country. Preventing, deterring, and prosecuting election fraud is essential to protecting the integrity of our voting process. Reforms intended to ensure such integrity do not disenfranchise voters and, in fact, protect their right to vote. Winning elections leads to political power and the incentives to take advantage of security vulnerabilities are great, so it is important that we take reasonable steps to make it hard to cheat, while making it easy for legitimate voters to vote.
1,298 Proven instances of voter fraud
1,121 Criminal convictions
48 Civil penalties
95 Diversion program
17 Judicial finding
17 Official finding
https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud
metmike: Go to WI for instance. Over 40 convictions which means many times more than that which they decided not to prosecute or they lost because they did not have overwhelming evidence and many, many times more that were never caught.
“could not read the entire thing as it would not come up...but did get to the part where it said "significant acts of fraud"....just where in our elections laws does it say we have to abide by any acts of fraud. Not to mention little things like poll watchers not being allowed to do their jobs, video evidence of several poll places having their glass covered over, all the rest that time and time again is passed on as just voting business as usual. “
And there we have a perfect example of what the gentleman was discussing.
how about keeping your commentary to yourself and answering my simple question I posed?
" Not to mention little things like poll watchers not being allowed to do their jobs, video evidence of several poll places having their glass covered over, all the rest that time and time again is passed on as just voting business as usual."
Do yourself a huge favor and stop believing those false narratives that were made up to make republicans think they were perpetrating fraud and trying to cover it with strategies that you just mentioned.
Regardless of what they did or did not do...........they were not covering fraud because their was no widespread fraud taking place.
There were the usual tiffs between poll watchers and people counting votes but it had ZERO, natta, nothing to do with anybody covering up fraud.
It's now been 7+ months since the election and the person that has exposed the most fraud, by a wide margin has been metmike...........showing proof from previous years tht was less this year.........making this the most secure election in history.
If you guys want to continue to be used by Trump and look like fools for believing this total crap.............I will continue to try my best to use reason to help you see the truth.
MM, after all these months I still get a kick out of words like "fraud" then "widespread fraud" then "not enough fraud to matter" now you have taken it to another level by deciding here on your own that interfering with poll watchers is meaningless. The election over. Never once said it was not. Just need a simple question answered, where in election law does it say we are to accept fraud? And to take another step if we let the 1960 fraud with Kennedy go where do we stop exactly? If we did find huge fraud now or anytime in the last months is there anyone here who really thinks things would of changed? Please, just stuff it under the rug and go on is what we would of done.
MM, after all these months I still get a kick out of words like "fraud" then "widespread fraud" then "not enough fraud to matter" now you have taken it to another level by deciding here on your own that interfering with poll watchers is meaningless. The election over. Never once said it was not. Just need a simple question answered, where in election law does it say we are to accept fraud? And to take another step if we let the 1960 fraud with Kennedy go where do we stop exactly? If we did find huge fraud now or anytime in the last months is there anyone here who really thinks things would of changed? Please, just stuff it under the rug and go on is what we would of done.
"where in election law does it say we are to accept fraud?"
mcfarm,
I found 10 times more REAL election fraud than everybody else combined here.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/71813/#71816
If you count the fake alleged fraud from those making up fraud, it would be 100 times.
As I have been saying for 7 months, show the specific fraud and I will investigate objectively. When you did that, I did what I said and busted every single one of your fake fraud cases that were entirely meant to sucker your brains into the made up election steal narrative.
Now, the position is to theorize/speculate on fraud that might be out there and to suggest that nefarious activity happened because poll watchers weren't allowed to watch every minute everywhere.......as if the polling had to be watched every minute or else the dems would pull a fast one.
Ironically, almost every case of proven fraud has come from the side alleging fraud.
My words and actions for 7 straight months scream out that we should never accept fraud, so let me ask you a much more relevant question.
mcfarm, where in election law does it say that we are to accept widespread alleging of fraud, fraud because thats what actually happened in the real world based on proven observations ....not the manufactured/theorized/speculative/fake fraud.
For instance, do you know how fraudulent this guy had to be to totally concoct this total horse manure? Everything made up to bamboozle people like you because he cares more about Trump helping him to make money than he cares about you. ...or the truth.
To him, this is just like one of his pillow commercials...............say a bunch of impressive/convincing sounding made up stuff to sell it.
mikelindells election tape
11 responses |
Started by mcfarm - Feb. 6, 2021, 8:58 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/65299/
What a dishonest, charlatan snake oil salesman. Somebody like this should be charged with a crime for stealing peoples intelligence and messing up the world.
Freedom of speech protects people so they can say all sorts of horrible, completely wrong things. The majority of people can't tell the truth from a lie when it comes from a source that says things they like to hear.
How many millions of Trump followers, including you, saw this and immediately thought "finally, we have the absolute proof of what Donald Trump has been telling us!!!"
This is exactly what he/they wanted. The production that went into totally making this stuff up must have taken hundreds of hours and numerous weeks, with numerous people involved. What the heck was going thru their heads?
A group of people master minding this, must have got together and decided to use their creativity to put together the most convincing sounding bs with all sorts of graphics and fake data....... they could manufacture.
People like this are EXACTLY the problem in the world today.
And what price does this guy pay?
OK, maybe there is justice below:
"During a court hearing Thursday in federal district court in Washington, D.C., attorneys for Powell and Lindell said Dominion acted in a government capacity during the last election. Because of this, Dominion has to prove that they acted with malice when they accused the company of manipulating votes, the attorneys argued, drawing on previous court cases barring public officials from suing people who criticize them."
metmike: Free speech allows people do/say plenty of dirty, unethical stuff but I am pretty confident that the group being sued by Dominion stepped so extremely far over the boundary with extremely unacceptable statements that were intentionally and very knowingly false(like this video-there is all made up stuff on it-not misinterpretation but MADE UP/CONCONCOCTED). This proves irrefutably what their motive was.
So mcfarm, your question continues to tell us that you are very concerned about election fraud........with none to show us. Where is your concern about the proven fraud for what Lindell and company did?
Ironically, mcfarmer and metmike were not the targets. It was you man. They were targeting you with their fraudulent schemes mcfarm.
Seriously, I would like to know how it makes you feel to know that you were used and have your intelligence stolen by these cruds?
You are my friend and it really ticks me off that they did this to many of my friends.