Does the media have too much power
8 responses | 0 likes
Started by wglassfo - Sept. 12, 2019, 3:02 a.m.

We all know the media can get a story twisted so far from reality it is almost comical for those who actually know, to read a poorly researched or other wise incorrect version of events

I have read about events that involved my livlihood, of which I have a rather extensive knowledge [and then to simplify this post], i will read where some reporter called a cow a horse or worse

But what about a media that refuses to print or reveal  a story that might be in the best interest of the people to know the story. This is not just poor reporting, this is a media that remains silent, about some things that people who should know, want the media to report their version of events

Instead the media is silent

We all have read enough Trump bashing media stories and golly, we all know Trump is fodder for the grist mill

But since this is the day or yesterday was: the story is 9/11

So what do we do when the media refuses to print what some think is a different story than the official federal story

Do we stay silent or do we ask questions. Do we let the media control what we read and believe

Is a person crazy to question the official story about 9/11, when the fire fighters question the offficial story and call for another investigation. The official commision tells us the investigation was set up to fail.

Are we brave enough to ask tough questions or is it best to remain silent

Perhaps we should ask if the media is doing it's job of actually reporting all the news.

Would it be the job of the media to report a third building came down, [if memory serves me correctly] 7 hrs after tower 1 and 2. And further more the fact some believe all the supporting towers, within the building, failed at the same time. Would this be something the media should report???

And yet when the fire fighters and assorted other people ask for another investigation, the media remains silent

Does the media do a good job of reporting the important news of the day, that we as the general population are well and properly served, by the main stream media???

By mcfarm - Sept. 12, 2019, 6:11 a.m.
Like Reply

Wayne, we have no media. The media is dead. They have lost their way and how they ever get back to their job of objectively reporting...the who, where, why and how....I do not know. Its embedded now in our society starting in 1st grade and continues thru college. Taking little kids brains and making mush out of them. The media today is the result of this form of brain washing and this TDS syndrome is the result also

By metmike - Sept. 12, 2019, 5:34 p.m.
Like Reply

They have completely gone off the antiscience deep end!

"TIME Magazine Devotes Entire Issue To Climate Change | Velshi & Ruhle | MSNBC"

Why TIME Devoted an Entire Issue to Climate Change

Guess who their top climate change/science sources were?

Al Gore, the world's greatest climate charlatan in history  and soon to be climate change billionaire.

Graca Machel, a human rights activist from Africa.

Ma Jun, an environmentalist from China and

Angeline Jolie.......seriously, the actor, Angeline Jolie:

              Time:Climate 2019

Angelina Jolie: Climate Change Is Already Displacing Millions of People. It's Our Responsibility to Help Them

metmike: The last 40 years have indisputably(by authentic science/facts) featured the best weather/climate for life on this massively greening planet in at least the last 1,000 years(the last time that it was this warm).

We are entering the start of another climate optimum, not a crisis or emergency.


"Temperature variations during the Holocene from a collection of different reconstructions and their average. The most recent period is on the right, but the recent warming is only seen in the inset.

Out of 140 sites across the western Arctic, there is clear evidence for conditions warmer than now at 120 sites. At 16 sites, where quantitative estimates have been obtained, local HTM temperatures were on average 1.6±0.8 °C higher than now.  Northwestern North America had peak warmth first, from 11,000 to 9,000 years ago, and the Laurentide Ice Sheet still chilled the continent.  Northeastern North America experienced peak warming 4,000 years later. Along the Arctic Coastal Plain in Alaska, there are indications of summer temperatures 2–3 °C warmer than present.[5] Research indicates that the Arctic had less sea ice than the present"

By metmike - Sept. 12, 2019, 5:43 p.m.
Like Reply
By metmike - Sept. 12, 2019, 6:14 p.m.
Like Reply

I kid you not when I say that there were a couple of times, a few years back when I was fully discovering the extent of the massive global  dynamics of the entities and fraudulence at play (in the time frame of closely studying the Climate Accord details-circa 2014-15) of this hijacking of and rewriting climate science for the political agenda.......that for a minute or 2........... I thought  I must be going  nuts!

I already knew most of the facts but the Climate Accord agreement by almost every country in the world to do something this profound,  that would have no effect on climate and if anybody would read it and see the role of China and India, increasing their emissions massively while getting our money, was, for a short period more than my brain could believe is possible. 

Here in 2019, as  it becomes more and more obvious that there is no crisis based on authentic science...........We are ramping it up to an emergency. A Green New Deal that makes absolutely no sense based on any realities in this world but every single democrat running for president is supporting. After them being wrong for decades on their predictions and not held accountable, they are now telling us 2030 is the new deadline to save the planet.............if we do exactly what they tell us.

By not doing anything that they told us to do for 30 years now..............the climate optimum and greening planet continue. 

How can this be?

How can so many people, some of them much smarter than me(but not about weather/climate if they are objective) with access to so much information be convinced  to believe in a manufactured reality? In busted simulations of the atmosphere going out 100 years that have all been too warm? That extreme weather events never happened before and when they happen today, it's from humans?

                Living in a twisted reality....            

                            Started by GunterK - Sept. 4, 2019, 2:18 p.m.    

  A global climate strike            

                            Started by metmike - March 15, 2019, 8:10 p.m.    


   Living in the world of escalating brainwash            

                            Started by metmike - May 18, 2019, 1:45 p.m.    

                Yuri Bezmenov - Ex-KGB on Ideological Subversion in America            

                            Started by madmechanic - Sept. 1, 2019, 1:23 p.m.    

By metmike - Sept. 12, 2019, 6:35 p.m.
Like Reply

The very sad thing about it is the brain washers are winning big.

Watch the debates tonight. There will not be one democrat that stands for authentic climate science and every single one of them will insist that they are for science.

Do 97% of experts agree with the IPCC that human CO2emissions are causing dangerous global warming?

"That "97%" claim is significant, not for what it reveals about the science of climate change, but for what it reveals about the Climate Movement spin machine. It turns out to be a classic example of the Big Lie."


             31,487 American scientists have signed this petition,
including 9,029 with PhDs

By metmike - Sept. 12, 2019, 6:47 p.m.
Like Reply

Funny how Snopes, tries to bust this petition by stating:

"the most important takeaway is that the only requirement to sign this petition is an undergraduate degree in any science or science-related field."

What's so funny about that are the sources used for the well followed Time Magazine's latest addition dedicated..............the entire issue to the climate crisis:

Al Gore, the world's greatest climate charlatan in history  and soon to be climate change billionaire.

Graca Machel, a human rights activist from Africa.

Ma Jun, an environmentalist from China and

Angeline Jolie.......seriously, the actor, Angeline Jolie:

So how many people know that tens of thousands of scientists(many with Phd's, some with just a BS) signed that petition and what it stated?

Surely its much less than those that read Time magazine and watch CNN/CNBC and all the other MSM sources that tell us  the complete opposite of what a large number of real scientists believe.

By metmike - Sept. 12, 2019, 6:52 p.m.
Like Reply

Because of freedom of the press, the media is not held accountable to being fair, objective, telling both sides, telling the truth(in many cases like this) verifying facts, and representing authentic climate science or prevented from misrepresenting recent weather events.

In this realm, they have turned into extreme political activists, stomping on the ethics and standards of professional journalism in the mission to advance this agenda.

By metmike - Sept. 12, 2019, 7:02 p.m.
Like Reply

Read this mind boggling screed from one of Time's top authors/sources in the latest issue to help you appreciate the stratospheric heights that these biased/dishonest people are going to in blatantly abusing their position as sources for supposedly reliable information to brainwash readers with completely manufactured bull.

                 Climate 2019                           

          Hello From the Year 2050. We Avoided the Worst of Climate Change — But Everything Is Different

He describes a completely different planet than the real one, which is greening up,  with its booming biosphere and life flourishing:

                Climate Reality discussions