oh, there is a crisis??? I thought there was none
yep... this worked out well in Europe.
A few months ago, she wanted to eliminate the DHS. No doubt in my mind, she wants to destroy the US. The scary part.... she is not alone
Good post. Extremists on both sides like the terrible Omar are further destroying what little unity this country has remaining. The two sides are verbally fighting each other like they're enemies. Maybe we will eventually break up into 2 although I have no idea how that can be accomplished or if it is even doable.
The United Nations?
Most people may wonder who started this fake climate crisis.
Actually, most people believe in it but may wonder what entity started sounding the alarms and acted to organize the world to fight it.
The UN ...........indisputably!
AP NEWS PETER JAMES SPIELMANN June 29, 1989
UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.
"Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ″eco- refugees,′ ′ threatening political chaos, said Noel Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program, or UNEP.
He said governments have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect before it goes beyond human control.
As the warming melts polar icecaps, ocean levels will rise by up to three feet, enough to cover the Maldives and other flat island nations, Brown told The Associated Press in an interview on Wednesday.
Coastal regions will be inundated; one-sixth of Bangladesh could be flooded, displacing a fourth of its 90 million people. A fifth of Egypt’s arable land in the Nile Delta would be flooded, cutting off its food supply, according to a joint UNEP and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency study."
metmike: Disaster didn't come in 2000. Then it didn't come in 2015 as predicted by Al Gore and the IPCC in 2007 and here in 2019, we are told that it will be here in 2030 for the same reasons that it was supposed to come 19 years ago and 4 years ago.
But we can save the planet by doing exactly what they tell us must be done...........even though we saved the planet over the last 30 years..............by doing the complete opposite of what they said had to be done. We burned even more more fossil fuels and massively increased CO2.
The real green new deal is the one which is causing the planet to massively green up from the increase in CO2.
The only green in the political Green New Deal is the green of your money changing hands............from out your pockets into the control of government.
When you are having a climate optimum like this one, disaster..................NEVER comes......unless you do what they say.
The UN is horribly biased against the US and Israel. So, I am not at all a fan.
The United Nations is a great organization in many respects with regards to their many accomplishments in helping the world's poor.
Most of what they ascribe to, uses great plans to make the world a better place for the billions of poor people. However, goal number 13 is a complete fraud as I will describe...... but note the year, 2030. Not just with goal 13 but with goals 1,2,3......17. Check it out.......Every single one of them have the year 2030.
Gee, what a coincidence that the Green New Deal is being sold in the US based on us saving the planet by 2030, the exact same year as the UN for every single goal in the UN's agenda is to be accomplished.
For them to suddenly understand the science so well(after being so wrong for 30 years), that they can predict the exact year, 2030 that we will lose the planet......UNLESS WE DO EXACTLY WHAT THEY SAY!
Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
Say Hello to your future Mommy and Daddy!
The UN is the organization that created the fraudulent Climate Accord.
Actions in the Climate Accord would do almost nothing to change the climate optimum(fake climate crisis).........because China, a poor country is allowed to increase emissions thru 2030(there's that year again) which will go up twice as fast as the rest of the world cuts..........but that doesn't matter and neither does the fact that emissions continue to soar higher since the agreement.
The agreement mainly imposes world socialism on all the country's in it.
The developed/rich countries donate money(trillions supposedly in the end) to the poor/undeveloped nations. Supposedly for climate reparations and climate adaptation because the rich countries ruined the global climate of the poor countries(seriously, that's what is stated)............right, the best climate of the last 1,000 years for life and growing food.
I describe here, the role of China, a poor country by the UN definition in the Accord which proves the point:
So you might wonder how in the heck the UN got the entire world to believe there is a climate crisis and sign on to this bogus Accord?
First of all, know that most of the world's countries are poor to very poor and they are all allowed to increase CO2 emissions and they all get money(our money), including China and India.
Why wouldn't every single one of those counties(majority) sign on?
But it's way more calculating and sinister than you could ever imagine...........and brilliant. The UN hijacked climate science over 3 decades ago to do this when they created the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
The worlds authority on climate that all countries and scientists would use as this newly created religion(belief in a fake climate crisis) as their climate bible.
I'm just copying what I have stated here before on this below, to save time as it hasn't changed 1 iota:
Initially, the United Nations created the IPCC(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) in the late 1980's. It was determined that this entity would be the worlds authority on human caused climate change and all governments and its scientists would follow their reports as their "climate bible" for what has turned into religious type beliefs about some of the information. Climate scientists around the world, use their reports and its assumptions..........many of which are very speculative. Their predictions have been too warm and wrong but are not being adjusted because what most people don't know, the IPCC is a political body, a governmental entity, which uses their reports to recommend aggressive political actions. Brilliant scientists around the world, use these reports as a starting point without actually understanding how the models work (they are just computer output from programming to simulate the future climate based on a speculative theory with faulty equations that have created far too much warming) and very few are operational meteorologists, for instance that have been objectively tracking the actual weather/climate the past 30 years to see how badly the models have performed.
Does this make me smarter than these scientists that have it wrong?
Hell no! Most of them are smarter than me. Many have PhD's and did better then me in college and can run circles around me using mathematical equations to represent the physics of the atmosphere. However, I've analyzed the global atmosphere for a living (using models to forecast) for over 3 decades, with a wonderful connection to what's been happening in the real atmosphere, while studying weather/climate history and .............. can judge objectively and accurately how well the simulations of the atmosphere have been doing......not so good in several areas but ok in others.
The profound evidence that the IPCC was blatantly corrupted early on, in a way that will be hard for you to comprehend..........but the proof is right here on the following pages.
One of the first things that the IPCC did was to erase the Medieval Warm Period from climate history.......because it showed temperatures warmer than this without humans causing it. Several corrupt climate scientists, especially Michael Mann and his tree ring study which led to the "hockey stick" graph played key roles.
Seriously, since they were deemed the world's climate authority, wiping out the Medieval Warm Period was accepted by mainstream science despite 100 previous studies that showed it. Despite over 100 studies that contradicted this result(see my source above) they did it and everybody excepted it..........ok, the governments and many of their climate scientists and those who wanted the best opportunities for funding accepted it which is even easier to accept when 80% of you, belong to the same group that supports the political agenda of the climate science hijacking.
Now, we had a new climate history graph that showed the current warming was unprecedented.
The first graph was the one that was featured in the IPCC's first report, in the 1990's, when they were using the 100+ climate history studies that are still valid today............... before they wiped out the Medieval Warm Period.
On the 2nd graph, look at the huge difference between the first one in the 1990's and 2001 in order to show that humans were causing all the warming.......no more Medieval Warm Period!!!!
The 2nd graph is based on one study, from a set of tree rings, from one corrupt climate scientist, Michael Mann..........all the other ones were tossed out.
Believe it or not, the majority of the liberal scientists decided to believe the 1 study(though most don't realize it's just based on 1 study) and all the science of the world authority on climate science,........the IPCC.
First IPCC report below, 1990's concurs with all other paleoclimatology.............there WAS a Medieval Warm Period:
2001 IPCC report below, after hijacking climate science. The Medieval Warm Period was completely wiped out(using one scientist's tree ring study) so that the Current Warm Period would appear to be unprecedented and caused by humans.
I will repeat this again because its the crux of what happened.
The IPCC was made the worlds authority on climate science. They then, took one set of tree rings from one scientist that showed no warming during the Medieval Warm Period(note the name WARM Period) which contradicted the vast majority(over 100) of the previous studies for that period and wiped out the Medieval Warm Period from climate history.
It would be ludicrous of Omar to suggest that the UN handle our affairs not knowing any of this.
Knowing what we do about them, however it would be extraordinarily counterproductive and in fact dangerous to trust the UN, unless we can verify the dynamics.
They do some good work.
I see what you mean about the UN and Israel. Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I didn't realize that it was this bad.
The following is a list of United Nations resolutions concerning Israel. As of 2013, Israel had been condemned in 45 resolutions by the United Nations Human Rights Council. Since the creation of the Council in 2006, it has resolved almost more resolutions condemning Israel than on the rest of the world combined. The 45 resolutions comprised almost half (45.9%) of all country-specific resolutions passed by the Council, not counting those under Agenda Item 10 (countries requiring technical assistance)
metmike: I have not looked at this very closely before. Why do you think the UN has this clear negative bias towards Israel?
Wow, this really is bad!
By contrast, EU states voted for 16 out of 21 resolutions singling out Israel. Yet these same EU states failed to introduce a single UNGA resolution on the human rights situation in China, Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, Belarus, Cuba, Turkey, Pakistan, Vietnam, Algeria, or on 175 other countries.
Below are the resolutions on Israel that have been adopted in the 73rd Session (2018-2019) of the UN General Assembly.