Relevant Radio
15 responses | 0 likes
Started by metmike - May 28, 2025, 6:50 p.m.

I'll be on, the awesome Catholic Radio Network/Relevant Radio and The Drew Mariani Show Thursday/tomorrow at 2:15 pm CDT to talk about Climate Change.

My good friend, Thomas the producer there emailed this article to me this morning and wanted comments on the show.

Weather Impact 

NASA Confirms Atmospheric Shift Over North America

 Photo of author 

By Ayman Rani

 

Otherwise known as fake news, disinformation and/or propaganda. 

Exaggerating/sensationalizing some things and stating outright lies about other things, while using grains of truth here and there. This is the quintessential example of a dangerous climate activist because they steal the  scientific intelligence of so many people for their biased, POLITICAL and other kinds of agenda. 

Many fake green energy supporters are involved with crony capitalism rather than politics. 

Most of these people, like the author are sincere with their hearts but many believe that the end justifies the means.  They wrongly believe that we are destroying the planet and this justifies their fairy tale science because they THINK are saving the planet. They are hurting science and stealing people's intelligence with their climate activism.

 https://www.google.com/search?q=By+Ayman+Rani++climate+stories&client=firefox-b-1-d&sca_esv=c28d7f4a7239b712&sxsrf=AE3TifPc_tu_918ewHhj35DLUy9qIfCWxg%3A1748454346782&ei=yks3aPm-L_jMp84PiLK6oAw&ved=0ahUKEwj5y_uB3MaNAxV45skDHQiZDsQQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=By+Ayman+Rani++climate+stories&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiHkJ5IEF5bWFuIFJhbmkgIGNsaW1hdGUgc3RvcmllczIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigATIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABSJJmUPI4WIhYcAJ4AJABAJgBvQGgAYIRqgEEMS4xM7gBA8gBAPgBAZgCC6ACvgvCAgoQABiwAxjWBBhHwgIEECMYJ8ICBRAAGO8FwgIIECEYoAEYwwTCAgoQIRigARjDBBgKmAMAiAYBkAYHkgcDMy44oAeyJrIHAzEuOLgHpgvCBwcwLjUuNS4xyAct&sclient=gws-wiz-serp

Community-Led Climate Change Solutions:

. A book co-authored by Rani, focuses on community-led and Indigenous-led approaches to climate change solutions. This book highlights the importance of Indigenous knowledge and traditional practices in addressing climate challenges.

Ayman Rani's work is connected to the broader concept of climate stories, which are personal narratives that explore the impacts of climate change on individuals and communities. These stories can range from feelings of despair to hope, and they often focus on emotional connections to the issue. 

++++++++++++++++++++

This is MY opinion, not the opinion of Relevant Radio or Drew Mariani.

https://relevantradio.com/listen/our-shows/the-drew-mariani-show/


Drew Mariani

Drew Mariani

 

Drew Mariani is an award-winning journalist, writer and broadcaster. He currently hosts The Drew Mariani Show™ reaching a potential audience of 220 million people. His 3-hour daily program offers a unique insight on the most important issues of the day and a platform for dialogue with listeners and newsmakers.


Comments
By metmike - May 28, 2025, 7:27 p.m.
Like Reply

Recent threads loaded with authentic science about our wonderful, greening planet during this climate optimum:


                The Beauty of Earth            

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/110136/



  DeathbyGREENING!            

                    https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/69258/ 


Therealenvironmental crisis's                           

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/27498/


   National Climate Emergency??????????!!!!!!!!!!!                                   

   https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/103492/

By metmike - May 29, 2025, 1:34 a.m.
Like Reply

The climate OPTIMUM that especially includes growing crops in the highest producing region of the world!

DROUGHT VARIABILITY AND TRENDS
IN THE MIDWEST UNITED STATES

https://www.drought.gov/sites/default/files/2022-02/Drought%20Variability%20and%20Trends%20in%20the%20Midwestern%20United%20States.pdf


Crop yields with climate change/increasing CO2........soybeans:

Yields have doubled in the last 40 years:


https://www.nass.usda.gov/Charts_and_Maps/Field_Crops/soyyld.php


Soybeans: Yield by Year, US


There obviously are other contributing factors with genetics and farming technology but the +CO2 and weather have been a big plus.

With Corn, it's a different picture because of the  introduction of nitrogen fertilizer causing corn yields to triple real fast and nothing to do with CO2 or weather during that initial tripling. However, recent decades have featured a steady increase, along with a steady increase in CO2 and beneficial weather.

http://crazyeddiethemotie.blogspot.com/2014/10/corn-questions-from-food-inc-worksheet.html

https://www.agry.purdue.edu/ext/corn/news/timeless/yieldtrends.html

US Corn yield trends


@kannbwx

A brief history of U.S. #corn yield growth since the 1860s  Notable growth in yields was seen after the adoption of modern fertilizers in the 1940s, which made drought years esp. in the 1980s stand out more than before (compare with 1930s Dust Bowl for example).

Image


Anothersecret about fossil fuels: Haber Bosch process-fertilizers feeding the planet using natural gas-doubling food production/crop yields. September 2019

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/39215/                   


            

                

By metmike - May 29, 2025, 12:17 p.m.
Like Reply


https://www.co2.earth/daily-co2


The optimal level for CO2 for most life is 900 ppm.

 Optimal CO2 for life more than double current level: See the proof with thousands of studies. Showing Scientific American.....and mainstream science sold to us........ to be wrong about plants and the affects from Climate Change. December 2020

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62784/

+++++++++++++++

Question. Does this common image of exhaust at a fossil fuel burning power plant show the so called CO2 pollution?

Answer: NO!  CO2 is invisible. You can't see it. It's a beneficial gas. We are looking at H2O, which is 95% of the greenhouse gas effect and also a beneficial gas. 


++++++++++++++++

For the global authority on CO2 and its impact on plants, go here:

https://www.co2science.org/video/cop/cop15.php

https://www.co2science.org/data/plant_growth/dry/dry_subject.php

Go to "data"   then "plant growth" and look up the response from any and every plant to CO2 enriched conditions in alphabetical order.

By metmike - May 29, 2025, 12:52 p.m.
Like Reply

Some informative stuff at this link:

Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide_in_Earth%27s_atmosphere


We should note that they don't tell us about things like the long lived Dust Bowls in the 1800s because of low CO2 levels and cold Pacific water temperatures/very strong La Nina's!  Along with crop failures and famines!

Or the harsh cold then and in the previous century because of the low atmospheric CO2.

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Death by GREENING!                       

                By metmike - Feb. 2, 2025, 7:54 a.m.            

By metmike - May 29, 2025, 6:13 p.m.
Like Reply

We are continually told that this weather/climate is a crisis/emergency.

Based on.............covering up past weather.

We all know about the Dust Bowl decade of the 1930's and most people think that was a freak event.

Actually, we had 3 Dust Bowls in the 2nd half of the 1800's, including the worst environmental disaster ever recorded, the Great GLOBAL DROUGHT/FAMINE that lasted 3 years.

The Dust Bowls in the United States happened because of COLD water in the Pacific Ocean(La Nina's) and LOW CO2 readings. 

Global warming and increasing CO2 has been protecting us the past 35 years. Only 1 widespread drought in the Midwest(2012) in the last 37 years since 1988, when we were averaging 1 widespread severe drought in the Midwest every 8 years prior to that, going back to the last 100 years.


Global cooling and LOW CO2 levels are what cause widespread, extremely long lasting droughts with catastrophic global and huge regional famines! 

Here in 2025, we are living in a climate optimum with absolute, scientific certainty!!

Causes and consequences of nineteenth century droughts in North America

https://ocp.ldeo.columbia.edu/res/div/ocp/drought/nineteenth.shtml

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

You want a REAL climate CRISIS?

This is what it looks like:

Can you imagine if this below happened today? It's less likely because climate change and the current climate OPTIMUM is helping to PROTECT US!

The planet had a REAL climate crisis between 1876 and 1878.

50 million people died. 3% of the global population died from that real climate crisis!

Causes of the Great Famine, One of the Deadliest Environmental Disasters

https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2017/12/15/causes-great-famine-drought/

Who was the photographer who took these dehumanising images of the Madras famine?



El-Niño Grande and the Great Famine (1876-78)

https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AGUFMGC51F..04S/abstract

The 1876-1878 Great Famine impacted multiple regions across the globe including parts of Asia, Nordeste Brazil, and northern and southern Africa, with total human fatalities exceeding 50 million people, arguably the worst environmental disaster to befall humanity.


NASA EXPLAINS THE DUST BOWL DROUGHT

https://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2004/0319dustbowl.html 

++++++++++++++++++

Climate change in the United States, with 100% certainty is helping to protect us from widespread severe droughts.

Summer Climate Change in the Midwest and Great Plains due to Agricultural Development during the Twentieth Century    

https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/32/17/jcli-d-19-0096.1.xml       


Fig. 1.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Fig. 2.


We are indisputably living in a climate optimum for most life on this planet(that would still prefer a bit more warmth and a lot more CO2) and for growing crops in the United States!  




By metmike - May 29, 2025, 7:26 p.m.
Like Reply

This was the Relevant Radio interview earlier today at the link below. 

May 29, hour 1 segment.

That segment starts around the 13 minute mark and ends at the 27 minute mark. Been awhile since I was on the radio and really long time since being on tv so my delivery wasn't great(in my opinion) and I failed to mention a ton of things but only had around 10 minutes.

https://relevantradio.com/listen/our-shows/the-drew-mariani-show/

By metmike - May 29, 2025, 7:44 p.m.
Like Reply

                Go Coal!            

                            Started by metmike - April 9, 2025, 1:40 a.m.      

      https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/111051/

                 Go Coal!            

                                        

                By metmike - April 16, 2025, 4:11 p.m.                        

                            

The biggest reason to use renewables is not because of the fake climate crisis!

It's because, cheap, reliable and energy dense fossil fuels will run out some day and we need to conserve them!!!

This is the global estimate below, which is likely much too conservative. 

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/years-of-fossil-fuel-reserves-left



Coal explained How much coal is left

https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/coal/how-much-coal-is-left.php

What is the amount of world coal reserves?

 

As of December 31, 2021, estimates of total world proved recoverable reserves of coal were about 1,161 billion short tons (or about 1.16 trillion short tons), and five countries had about 75% of the world's proved coal reserves.

 

  • The top five countries and their percentage share of world proved coal reserves as of December 31, 2021, were:2
  • United States22%
  • Russia15%
  • Australia14%
  • China14%
  • India11%

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

THE UNITED STATES


Six states had 77% of the demonstrated reserve base (DRB) of coal as of January 1, 2023:1

  • Montana—25%
  • Illinois—22%
  • Wyoming—12%
  • West Virginia—6%
  • Kentucky—6%
  • Pennsylvania—5%

 

Twenty six other states had the remaining 23% of the DRB.

We have some decent coal in the ground in this area of southwest Indiana

By metmike - May 29, 2025, 8:02 p.m.
Like Reply

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: : Droughts not increasing            

                     By metmike - Aug. 30, 2023, 3:32 p.m.            

            

Bjorn Lomborg@BjornLomborg

China has now approved/building more new coal power than all existing US coal plants More provinces "jump on the bandwagon" China didn't get the "but renewables are cheaper" memo (because infinitely costly when no wind/sun) https://archive.ph/FOPTx

China’s new coal power spree continues as more provinces jump on the bandwagon

https://energyandcleanair.org/publication/chinas-new-coal-power-spree-continues-as-more-provinces-jump-on-the-bandwagon/

Key findings

 

  • The coal power plant permitting spree that started in summer 2022 has continued in the first half of 2023 and into July. From January to June, construction was started on 37 GW (gigawatts) of new coal power capacity, 52 GW was permitted of which 10 GW already moved into construction, while 41 GW of new projects were announced and 8 GW of previously shelved projects were revived. All of these parts of the project pipeline are currently running at a pace of more than one coal power plant per week.
  • 152 GW has been permitted and 169 GW announced since the start of the current spree in early 2022. This means that China is accelerating the additions of new coal power capacity during the current five-year plan period (2021–25) compared to either of the preceding two five-year plan periods. 
  • China now has 243 GW of coal power under construction and permitted. When projects currently announced or in the preparation stage but not yet permitted are included, this number rises to 392 GW. This means that coal power capacity could increase by 23% to 33% from 2022 levels, 
  • ++++++++++++++++++++++


https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/98304/#98314

This is nothing but a pack of blatant lies to sell crony capitalism, political agenda, dishonest science and ratings seeking media, along with completely misled counterproductive environmentalism!

Here's the truth below:

Tony Heller@TonyClimate

·If you were serious about reducing CO2 emissions you would be protesting in Asia, not the US or Europe where CO2 emissions have been declining for decades.#ClimateScamhttps://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-co2-emissions-per-country?country=USA~OWID_EUR~OWID_ASI

Image

metmike: What do China and India know that we don't?

It's called authentic science, energy and economics based on physical laws not fake green fairy tales.

++++++++++++++

CO2 is well mixed in the global atmosphere. 

The US can go to 0 billion (from 5 billion)  emissions but it won't matter that much when Asia(China+India) is t well over 20 billion and increasing rapidly. 

By WxFollower - May 30, 2025, 1:21 a.m.
Like Reply

Hey Mike,

 Fascinating but tragic stuff back in the 1800s. Thanks for sharing!

 Did you know that 1877-8 was the strongest El Niño of the second half of the 1800s and that there wasn’t another comparably strong one til 1997-

 https://www.webberweather.com/ensemble-oceanic-nino-index.html

By metmike - May 30, 2025, 6:30 a.m.
Like Reply

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/112212/


Weather Post of All TIme-WxFollower
Started by metmike - May 30, 2025, 6:24 a.m.

WxFollower just made a post so profound that it tremendously enhanced my entire understanding of the extreme weather during the 1800's!


                Re: Relevant Radio          
                            By WxFollower - May 30, 2025, 1:21 a.m.            

            Hey Mike,

 Fascinating but tragic stuff back in the 1800s. Thanks for sharing!

 Did you know that 1877-8 was the strongest El Niño of the second half of the 1800s and that there wasn’t another comparably strong one til 1997-

 https://www.webberweather.com/ensemble-oceanic-nino-index.html

++++++++++

Here's the awesome graphs at Larry's link. Let's use this to discuss the extreme weather/climate caused by El Nino's and La Nina's in greater detail to enhance everybody's understanding.

By metmike - May 31, 2025, 12:20 p.m.
Like Reply

I'm going to repeat the story on the first page that got this thread started because its:

Fake News!

It's an example of how a very skilled person can use the technology of the internet to push whatever propaganda they want. Lot's of impressive graphics and sciencey sounding verbiage along with constantly siting a credible source but NEVER ONCE showing an actual study or link from that source or any other source as evidence of their FAKE or distorted/exaggerated impacts for the  Atmospheric shift over North America. 

That's because the vast majority of  the impacts of their "Atmospheric Shift" are completely manufactured.

Weather Impact 

NASA Confirms Atmospheric Shift Over North America

 Photo of author 

By Ayman Rani

 


AI Overview

NASA studies have indicated shifts in North America's atmospheric patterns due to climate change. These shifts are linked to factors like the movement of ice and groundwater, which are altering the Earth's rotation speed and impacting weather patterns. Specifically, the lengthening of days due to these changes is accelerating, and NASA predicts this trend will continue or even accelerate if greenhouse gas emissions increase. 

Earth's Rotation: 

NASA-funded studies have shown that changes in ice and groundwater, driven by climate change, are affecting how fast the Earth rotates. 


  • Day Length: 
    The rate at which the length of a day is increasing due to these changes has accelerated since the year 2000. 
  • Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 
    If greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise, the lengthening of the day could potentially exceed the impact of the Moon's tides, which has historically been the primary driver of day-length increase, according to NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) (.gov). 
  • Regional Impacts: 
    These atmospheric shifts are contributing to changes in weather patterns, with potential consequences for drought, wildfires, and the intensity of extreme weather events in North America. 
  • Climate Change Models: 
    NASA uses sophisticated computer models and satellite data to understand and predict these changes. 
  • NASA's Role: 
    NASA's role is to provide robust scientific data and insights into climate change. 
  • ++++++++++

++++++++++++++

If we go to their link/source to find out more about what sounds like a very serious problem, we get this:


"They found that, since 2000, days have been getting longer by about 1.33 milliseconds per 100 years, a faster pace than at any point in the prior century. The cause: the accelerated melting of glaciers and the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets due to human-caused greenhouse emissions. Their results were published July 15 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

“The common thread between the two papers is that climate-related changes on Earth’s surface, whether human-caused or not, are strong drivers of the changes we’re seeing in the planet’s rotation,” said Surendra Adhikari, a co-author of both papers and a geophysicist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California."

+++++++++++++++++++

"1.33 milliseconds per 100 years"

How much is that really?

There are 1,000 milliseconds in a second. So 1.33 milliseconds every 100 years is 1.3 seconds every 100,000 years.

There are 31,536,000 seconds in a year. They are telling us that in 100,000 years there will be 31,536,001 seconds.

They blow that up into something they claim is part of the climate crisis doom.  Even if it were 1,000 times greater than that..........1.3 seconds every 100 years, where is the crisis to our planet?

This came from Google's Artificial Intelligence. Does that sound very intelligent to you??

AI just regurgitates what is out there to the best of its ability, using consensus. This accurately reflects what the majority opinion is. Good indicator much of the time.

However, when the majority are wrong, THEY ARE WRONG, no matter how many there are or how much power they have as message gatekeepers.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Let's add to this:

AI stated above: 

  • Regional Impacts: 
    These atmospheric shifts are contributing to changes in weather patterns, with potential consequences for drought, wildfires, and the intensity of extreme weather events in North America. 

metmike: Is that a good summary of the OBJECTIVE/AUTHENTIC science? Or is it a summary of one side of the science which represents the consensus of messages on the internet from the gatekeepers that only tell us BAD THINGS and that this is a CLIMATE CRISIS? AI only knows the latter. 

The indisputable, authentic HONEST science is that this is a climate OPTIMUM for almost all life.

+++++++++++++++++++

Let me demonstrate how DIShonest scientists manipulate the science to trick us into believing otherwise because of their cognitive bias that uses the ANTI science method.

It was well agreed on by scientists in every field and proven without question based on observations and research  from geologists, paleo-climatologists and other scientific fields that there was a very significant warming between 11,000-5,000 years ago that exceeded the current warm period by a couple of degrees C. in the higher latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, exactly where the greatest warm temperature anomalies are today. There was clearly LESS Arctic ice then.

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: April 2025 global temperature            

                            By metmike - May 6, 2025, 5:41 p.m.       

Holocene climatic optimum

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_climatic_optimum

Not only was it warmer then, the beneficial CO2 was at dangerously low levels. The optimal level of CO2 for life is 900 ppm, double this. Calling it a pollutant is a political lie, contradicted by authentic biology/science.

CO2 dropping by 150 ppm instead of increasing beneficially by 150(releasing CO2 that used to be in the atmosphere previously) and none of us would be here right now CO2. The already extremely low CO2 prior to the current climate optimum era for our planet was causing massive crop failures and famines..........

The planet is currently recovering from a biological CO2 famine! Almost all life would prefer much more CO2 and temperatures a bit warmer.  Our dishonest consensus science refuses to dial in the profoundly positive response to increasing CO2  from the biosphere, crops and VAST majority of creatures.

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/69258/

At least there is enough legit science on the internet left from before climate science was hijacked and climate history rewritten (by groups like the IPCC) that AI is stable able to regurgitate that accurately.  And also from honest climate scientists.

+++++++++++

So this is how dishonest scientists get around that. They use computer models to REWRITE climate history. Throw out the many, many thousands of observations of the empirical and anecdotal data from objective climate science and program a model with information that tells it that never happened and call that a "Mystery Solved"

This is an outrage and blatant violation of the scientific method but they not only get away with it, they now represent the consensus in this particular field. 

Important Climate Change Mystery Solved by Scientists  

   February 16, 2021

todd.bates@rutgers.edu

Revised Holocene temperature record affirms role of greenhouse gases in recent millennia

https://www.rutgers.edu/news/important-climate-change-mystery-solved-scientists

The long-standing mystery is called the “Holocene temperature conundrum,” with some skeptics contending that climate model predictions of future warming must be wrong. The scientists say their findings will challenge long-held views on the temperature history in the Holocene era, which began about 12,000 years ago.

“Our reconstruction shows that the first half of the Holocene was colder than in industrial times due to the cooling effects of remnant ice sheets from the previous glacial period – contrary to previous reconstructions of global temperatures,” said lead author Samantha Bova, a postdoctoral researcher associate in the lab of co-author Yair Rosenthal, a Distinguished Professor in the Department of Marine and Coastal Sciencesand Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences at Rutgers University–New Brunswick. “The late Holocene warming was indeed caused by the increase in greenhouse gases, as predicted by climate models, and that eliminates any doubts about the key role of carbon dioxide in global warming.”



How temperature evolved during the Last Interglacial and Holocene eras is controversial. Some data suggest that the average annual global temperature during modern times does not exceed the warmth in the Holocene’s early warm period, called the “Holocene thermal maximum,” which was followed by global cooling. Meanwhile, climate models strongly suggest that global temperatures have risen throughout the past 10,000 years.

“The apparent discrepancy between climate models and data has cast doubts among skeptics about the role of greenhouse gases in climate change during the Holocene and possibly in the future,” Rosenthal said. “We found that post-industrial warming has indeed accelerated the long and steady trend of warming throughout the past 10,000 years.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

They programmed a model to completely wipe out the Holocene climate optimum warmth,  and completely erase the  Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age that happened with 100% certainty just based on historical events that recorded the weather/climate during those times as well as thousands of scientific data/evidence. Instead they have an intentionally programmed model that produced the bold/underlined output/result above. And they called it science. It's phony baloney from very dishonest scientists!

The IPCC, InterGOVERNMENTAL Panel on Climate Change, a political organization was the first to start doing this in the 1990's. Today, their annual reports serve as updated passages for the climate bible for climate religion worshipers. 

I documented them doing this and debunked them countless times here:

   Science corruption (IPCC)                    

                Started by metmike - March 20, 2023, 5:50 p.m.     

       https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/93926/

++++++++

                IPCC ?            

                            Started by 7475 - Feb. 4, 2024, 8:08 p.m.     

       https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/102088/

+++++++++++++++++

This post shows it extremely well:

                The myth of affordable green energy is over            

                       By metmike - Oct. 12, 2023, 11:19 a.m.            

Relevant Radio
0 likes
By metmike - May 31, 2025, 12:32 p.m.
Like Reply

I looked and looked to try to find sources for this person's FAKE NEWS story.

This is the closest thing that I could find that represents authentic science. A solid commentary by a legit scientist sharing his research with us:


Commentary


Zhe Li

Zhe Li

                                                                         October 12, 2024 4:00 am

Atmospheric rivers are shifting poleward, reshaping global weather patterns

https://alaskabeacon.com/2024/10/12/atmospheric-rivers-are-shifting-poleward-reshaping-global-weather-patterns/#:~:text=Our%20study%20shows%20that%20atmospheric%20rivers%20have,north%20and%2030%20degrees%20south%20since%201979.


What it means for the future

 

So far, the shifts we have seen still mainly reflect changes due to natural processes, but human-induced global warming also plays a role. Global warming is expected to increase the overall frequency and intensity of atmospheric rivers because a warmer atmosphere can hold more moisture.

How that might change as the planet continues to warm is less clear. Predicting future changes remains uncertain due largely to the difficulty in predicting thenatural swings between El Niño and La Niña, which play an important role in atmospheric river shifts.

As the world gets warmer, atmospheric rivers – and the critical rains they bring – will keep changing course. We need to understand and adapt to these changes so communities can keep thriving in a changing climate.The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


This was the actual study(NOT BY NASA):

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adq0604

++++++++++++++++

Just to repeat, this person at the top that manufactured the article is a skilled climate activist propaganda producer, absolutely NOT a scientist. Not a scientifically honest person.

 Photo of author 

By Ayman Rani

By metmike - May 31, 2025, 12:52 p.m.
Like Reply

Speaking of "the majority" that serves as our fake climate crisis message gatekeepers from 2 pages up,

When was the last time that they told you about this?

Answer: Never!


                Weather (Climate) Post of All TIme-WxFollower            

                            Started by metmike - May 30, 2025, 6:24 a.m.            

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/112212/

By metmike - May 31, 2025, 5:07 p.m.
Like Reply

This page above was updated with numerous additional posts that fit best with that part of this discussion:

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/112178/#112250

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

                Re: Re: Re: Re: RFK Jr. Says US Will Know Cause of Autism          

                           By metmike - May 31, 2025, 8:50 p.m.            

Related to Google's AI completely failing to provide the authentic science on this topic in a search:

WARNING:

Only use AI for limited searches and not for critical information that you must be sure is authentic.

AI will only regurgitate the consensus of what is out there. If there is enough bs defining a topic that serves as the consensus, AI will fail miserably for providing independent,  objective and authentic information for definitive  discernment. 

It will also fail in other ways.

AI still operates on the principle of "garbage in.......garbage out"!

Garbage In, Garbage Out? Trust In The Data Behind AI Is Vanishing

https://www.forbes.com/sites/joemckendrick/2025/04/22/garbage-in-garbage-out-trust-in-the-data-behind-ai-is-vanishing/


By metmike - June 2, 2025, 11:42 a.m.
Like Reply

Most of the MSM participates in the fake climate crisis alarmism. A huge reason for the media to do it is for ratings, as well as their staff being climate alarmists that are convinced we are destroying the planet and that 1 sided messages are the only thing that can save the greening up planet that would, in truth love even more CO2 "pollution"!


Bad science journalism     

Forbes’ False Alarm: NASA Claims on Worsening Weather Debunked by Data

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/05/31/forbes-false-alarm-nasa-claims-on-worsening-weather-debunked-by-data/

Figure 1: Graphic from Fifth National Climate Assessment report, chapter 2: https://nca2023.globalchange.gov/chapter/2/#fig-2-7

+++++++++++++++++++

We discussed this last week here:

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Weather Post of All TIme-WxFollower            

                           By metmike - May 30, 2025, 8:46 a.m.            

+++++++++++++++++++


                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Weather Post of All TIme-WxFollower          

                           By metmike - May 30, 2025, 8:51 a.m.       

+++++++++++++++

Extremely high day time readings are falling in tandem with  the humidity increasing.

This has been protecting us from widespread major droughts in the Midwest. 

Higher humidity and lower daytime readings also lowers the evaporation rates and helps preserve soil moisture. 

                Re: Weather (Climate) Post of All TIme-WxFollower           

                            By metmike - May 30, 2025, 7:12 p.m.          


In addition, massive photosynthesis from tightly packed rows of corn is taking some of the heat energy out of the air by converting solar energy into chemical energy via photosynthesis.

     The chemical energy is in the form of plant material(food) which can be burned by animals thru their metabolism. In addition the inedible portions of all plants/trees are stored chemical energy that came from the sun and this too can be burned.

This is actually the origin of fossil fuels. It's all energy that came from the sun. Originally converted by plants into chemical energy that was buried in the earth, decomposed into peat and massively compressed into coal. Natural gas and oil deposits are also solar energy that came from a similar biogenic process.

The CO2 emissions released from burning these fossil fuels is just releasing the BENEFICIAL CO2 back into the atmosphere that was there BEFORE plants used it millions of years ago performing photosynthesis to convert solar energy into chemical energy.

Fossil fuels are the only Authentic green energy because only this form of energy is massively greening up and feeding the planet via the natural and indisputable law of photosynthesis.

Every animal eats plants or eats something that ate plants.  

There are over 8 billion extremely advanced  such animals that have the intelligence to know much better than to vilify the beneficial gas, CO2 which is only half the optimal level for life. We are almost the the only form of life that does not want much MORE CO2.

However, alot of us humans follow climate religion not authentic biology and indisputable scientific principles.