Word of the year-climate emergency
7 responses | 0 likes
Started by metmike - Nov. 21, 2019, 12:37 p.m.

Oxford Dictionaries declares 'climate emergency' the word of 2019

Usage of the term increased 100-fold in the space of 12 months, dictionary says


https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/nov/21/oxford-dictionaries-declares-climate-emergency-the-word-of-2019


"Oxford Dictionaries has declared “climate emergency” the word of the year for 2019, following a hundred-fold increase in usage that it says demonstrated a “greater immediacy” in the way we talk about the climate.

Defined as “a situation in which urgent action is required to reduce or halt climate change and avoid potentially irreversible environmental damage resulting from it”, Oxford said the words soared from “relative obscurity” to “one of the most prominent – and prominently debated – terms of 2019.”

According to the dictionary’s data, usage of “climate emergency” soared 10,796%."


metmike: This is exactly what I've been telling you is going on. Controlling the language to brainwash the people into thinking the current climate optimum(based on all authentic science-until now) is a climate crisis/emergency.

The brainwash tactics are in high gear. Controlling the language and using propaganda is crushing authentic and objective science...........absolutely crushing it.

Comments
By metmike - Nov. 21, 2019, 12:41 p.m.
Like Reply

Inside the media conspiracy to hype Greta Thunberg

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/11/20/inside-the-media-conspiracy-to-hype-greta-thunberg/

  • More than 200 media outlets and journalists partnered together with activists to coordinate and hype climate change news before the 2019 U.N. climate summit.
  • Two of the largest media outlets — BuzzFeed News and HuffPo — did not disclose their role in the project to their readers, a Daily Caller News Foundation review found.
  • The project raises questions about whether journalists should work side-by-side with activists to hype climate change.

Over 250 news outlets and journalists partnered with Columbia University School of Journalism’s flagship magazine to shape control of “climate crisis” coverage in the lead up to the United Nations climate conference. The coverage-coordination initiative included directing how much time, space and prominence should be devoted to the coverage, and asking that climate “news” be added to seemingly unrelated stories.

By metmike - Nov. 21, 2019, 12:43 p.m.
Like Reply

This was my comment at the previous link:

 

That is how you get complete control of the messages, using false narratives and fake news  and half truths to propagandize the people………who are relenentlessly bombarded with the exact same stuff and accept it because the gate keepers have established a cult like environment with them as the high priests who don’t report objective news any more but instead impose their belief system, abusing their reedoms of the press.

They are using the same strategy to control messages related to President Trump. They have the exact same objectives and act in unison to tell us what we should know,.
The education system has also been hijacked to indoctrinate our young people into these religious type beliefs……based on faith in the high priests of propaganda and their manufactured realities.
The manufactured realities define our world to such an extent that they have replaced the real world, including speculative climate model projections replacing observations and measurements/empirical data and critical thinking.

Monumental brainwashing on a global scale which began decades ago when climate science was hijacked for the political agenda. 

Your average person thinks they are informed and too smart to let this happen. After all, the information they trust is endorsed by 97% of climate scientists. What they have no idea about is that convincing sounding information IS the propoganda being sold with a clever “save the planet” altruistic marketing scheme.
How would they know the difference if they are only told one thing?

If I raised a child and taught them from a young  age that the animal we call a dog, was really called a cat and what we call a cat is really a dog and didn’t let them have access to the real world, how would they  know it was the other way around?

The gatekeepers of the climate crisis/emergency messages/information/propaganda are intentionally denying us access to information in the real world that would inform us to a state which is capable of questioning their brainwash.

By metmike - Nov. 21, 2019, 12:51 p.m.
Like Reply

Here are 2 dozen articles/discussions on climate change.

                Climate Reality discussions            

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/27864/



In almost half of them, I discuss exactly what they are doing, how they are doing it and why they are doing it.

IT, is manufacturing a completely fake climate crisis/emergency when we are having the best weather/climate in over 1,000 years-what was known by all of legit climate science as a climate optimum........... until climate science got hijacked by politics for the agenda.

There absolutely IS NO CLIMATE CRISIS/EMERGENCY! It's the exact opposite.

We rescued the planet from dangerously low levels of beneficial CO2!

Note the planets reaction:

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/27864/


Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds

                   

      

From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States.

globe of Earth from North Pole perspectiveThis image shows the change in leaf area across the globe from 1982-2015.
By metmike - Nov. 21, 2019, 1:05 p.m.
Like Reply

How do I know these things?

As an objective, independent atmospheric scientist, I've  analyzed weather and climate patterns for 37 years(trading commodities based on this).

I have all the data(that they won't show you) and share it freely. 

They use scary words like "crisis" and "emergency" and tell you its the end of the world in 12 years if we don't do what they say. They base it all on speculative computer  model simulations going out 100 years that have been wrong so far(because they are using the wrong equations)

I show you the data, facts and real world observations.

I also have integrity and tell the truth based on facts/science(always) vs trying to manipulate people to act and think a certain way for self serving interests(in politics).

Sadly, I am no match for the forces that use deception and lies to perpetrate this hoax(climate change is REAL but its benefits greatly outweigh the negatives).

But maybe a few people can be enlightened.



By GunterK - Nov. 21, 2019, 2:13 p.m.
Like Reply

we are lucky to be here on this forum. And we are even luckier, to have metmike, an expert who presents facts to make us realize that the other side is nothing but hype, falsehoods and propaganda

However, the vast majority of the People get their news from the MSM... and they wil become (or already are) sincere believers of the hype

Nice words there, by Mr. King. However, if you are lost in the wilderness of Northern Alaska, at midnight, turning on your cigarette lighter will not make the darkness go away.

By metmike - Nov. 21, 2019, 6:50 p.m.
Like Reply

Thanks Gunter!

Great analogy.

There are numerous, profoundly negative elements relate to this.

1. The purpose has become to scare the heck out of people to get them to act. Seriously, if you believed that there was a chance that in less than 12 years, the world and life on it would be facing an apocolypse how would you not be petrified? The only way that you don't worry over that is if you don't believe them because that's what they are selling.  

There are tens of  millions of people that have measurable anxiety over this and millions where it effects the quality of enjoyment of their lives.  Many of them are children that are being taught they might not have an adult life because we are destroying the planet and after 2030, it's over.  

2. As somebody that teaches chess and other lessons to our young people and tries to impart authentic information, sharing with others here(whether its weather, climate, trading, history, science or something else) to make them smarter, its an outrage that we have those who are doing the exact opposite. Teaching junk science to propagandise a fake climate emergency and making everybody that falls for it DUMBER. 

3. Then there is the objective. Self serving interests that reap massive benefits(100's of trillions in the next decade if maximized) Governments get control and carbon tax revenue. Scientists get unlimited funding. The Climate Accord will do nothing to affect the climate. It is entirely a plan for global socialism where the rich countries give up there stuff to the poor countries. That is it.  In the US, it also serves to help to  bring  socialism and as fairy tale plans like the Green New Deal are entirely based on "saveing the planet" from the fake climate emergency.

But their plan is working.  Trump being president has only slowed things down temporarily. You can see the monumental resistance.  When Trump is gone, things will rapidly accelerate in this direction.

There is no stopping it. The train has left the station.

By metmike - Nov. 21, 2019, 11:18 p.m.
Like Reply


Climate Activists Take Over Pelosi’s Office

https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/19/climate-activists-pelosi/


"Climate activists from the group Extinction Rebellion are occupying House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office for a hunger strike until she agrees to convene with them."


metmike: It seems clear that these people are sincere and hope to have a positive impact but so sad that their understanding of science has been so distorted as to have no clue that they are protesting the best weather and climate in over 1,000 years.

They are being used because they don't understand climate science. 

Instead of them being completely counterproductive (by trying to change something that is irrefutably good based on authentic science)  they could be using this time and energy to help other human beings that are less fortunate or to protest real pollution. 

Pursue a legit cause to make the world a better place. 

All this time, money/resources and effort and what exactly has it accomplished over the last 3 decades? 

And proposed future actions, are all detrimental to the human condition with zero effects on climate. They are oblivious of this fact. 


The real environmental crisis's/insects dying-dead zones-aquifers drying up-plastics in the ocean: April 2019

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/27498/