It's pretty obvious to me now, mcfarm.

Paul Pelosi has a serious drinking problem and had way too many drinks before he went to bed or possibly he took some strong sleeping meds, like Ambian.

Ambian, after it kicks in will cause people to sometimes black out for the first couple of hours after it kicks in.

I know from watching years of it happening with my wife.

It caused him to turn off the alarm that went off when the guy was breaking in, then be extremely confused after he entered.

A functional alcoholic or person taking these sleeping meds for years can be totally confused (with their brains in auto pilot) but seemingly not severely intoxicated to those around them.

Paul Pelosi was on, either excessive alcohol or sleeping meds or a combination and it caused him to be extremely confused.

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/90115/#90165

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/90115/#90170

I think the cover up now appears to be the fact that the Pelosi's DO have plenty of security and in 99.9% of cases it would have worked great and the cops would have been alerted  from the get go but Paul apparently messed it up/turned it off by his confusion from whatever he was taking....operator error, so to speak.

On top of that, Capital Police  messed up their security protection because it happened right in front of their cameras!........and nobody noticed.

There was an outcry for better security after this happened. This was hogwash. 

They had Capital Security AND a private home security system. 

Maybe after the DUI a few months earlier, another strong indication that the guy has a problem, they didn't want that to be known?

Speculation.

But clearly, Paul Pelosi was 100% a victim here and there was no nefarious attempts by the Pelosi's or others to create a scenario to make republicans look bad.

 Or cover up a secret visitor to the house that Paul was expecting, then things went wrong. That's absurd.

https://sonitrolsecurity.com/panic-buttons-to-the-rescue/

We just got our monthly call from Sonitrol to test the panic button on our security system.

I went upstairs, next to my bed and pushed the button on the remote and for the 300th straight time, since we moved here in the late 1990's, they got the signal.

The private security system that the Pelosi's have, HAD TO have the same set up. It's a no brainer in the industry. This is in addition to Capital Security they had.

The next door private security guard witnessed that private security siren going off, so we know it was triggered by the break in with 100% certainty.

This is what had to have happened.

There are a dozen reasons for the home owner to trigger false alarms. Setting it wrong happens all the time. Forgetting to turn it off in the morning and going out the front door.

There a box to control everything on the main floor and one in the bedroom(where Paul was sleeping). When a false alarm is triggered, with the ear piercing sirens blaring(to scare the intruder-so they'll flee) the home owner has 2 minutes(might vary with some systems) to put in their 4 digit code to disengage the alarm so the private security firm does not send out the cops. 

Without this build in feature to quickly cancel the false alarm, police would be constantly showing up at false alarms in every city around the country. 

The private security guard couldn't have just imagined the siren, especially since it went off after he heard the loud pounding of the break in immediately before it went off, which was after he saw the guy walking to Pelosi's house with a back pack

But somebody, that could only be a person with the 4 digit security code at the house(or the security company) turned it off quickly. Only Paul Pelosi could have done that from his bedroom key pad, which he would likely have done dozens of times in the past from the many false alarms these systems trigger, more likely from the downstairs key pad at those previous times.

The intruder didn't hold a hammer to his head and demand he turn off the alarm. The alarm was turned off too quickly for one thing, before he could have found Pelosi. The other thing is that the panic button was NEVER USED. 

Everybody has access to 911 and its appropriate to call when Pelosi did. However,  he had a dang panic button, which everybody keeps next to their bed in case an intruder breaks in like this.

You can't cancel a panic button alarm at home. You could call the security company real fast and say "I accidentally hit our panic button" otherwise, the cops are coming to your house, assuming the worst. It could be a medical emergency too.

Paul Pelosi did NOTHING wrong. Getting extremely drunk or taking strong sleeping meds at home is every Americans right. In this case, it caused his confusion(as noted from the extremely odd things that he was saying to the 911 operator) and could have gotten him killed because of the confusion.

NOT cancelling the alarm in his bedroom and/or pressing the panic button would have immediately triggered an emergency call from the cops, who would have assumed the worst until proven otherwise and been there within minutes expecting either a break in or a homeowner needing an ambulance. 

We've had this technology since the late 1990's, so it's nothing new and the Pelosi's had it and there's nothing better than the security that they already had.

+++++++++++++

The absurd thing about this entire incident is the DISinformation and covering up.

Republicans speculated about a nefarious relationship between Paul and this guy being covered up or this being intentionally staged  to make it appear as if this guy was a (fake) intruder when he wasn't.

Democrats tried to tie it to the far right and claimed that this is proof that our politicians need more security to protect them and still are not coming clean about why both security systems failed because of HUMAN ERROR.

Democrats/Pelosi's not being transparent about this is what led to republicans speculating into a more nafarious realm than what actually took place. The more unknowns that are there, the bigger the opportunities are to create manufactured realities based on wild speculation. Add in all the explanations that don't make sense or don't fully explain the situation........(the explanation that I just gave is not being provided by 1 source of the hundreds that I've read but it's 99%+ likely what really happened) and you create even more nefarious speculating.

It's all ludicrous. The Pelosi's have double security systems covering them. At least 1 of  the 2 would have worked 99.9999% of the time if they were used properly.

They don't have special security systems better than this that can work to offset operator error from being too drunk or medically drugged.

And Capital Security is paid to monitor the house.......but they failed to watch their monitors. The blame is not on LACK OF security it's on NOT USING the extremely effective security already in place because of human incompetence.

If they had just been totally honest/transparent about that up front.......it would have avoided all this.

And of course the Pelosi's and their private security system provider know exactly what happened. For that, the Pelosi's do bear the responsibility for not being completely truthful.

I believe that humans may be losing the ability to do critical thinking and objective analysis or independent investigating that existed in the past. It may be getting conditioned out of our brains from the way that our technology gives immediate answers to every question by just googling it or listening/reading sources that tell us what we want to hear.

After repeating this process(having it reinforced)  many 10's of thousands of times, our brains have literally been permanently conditioned to getting new information via that path instead of independently seeking out the answers by looking for clues and explanations from all the potential factors, that includes gaining insight into areas that we/they are not familiar with that are the basis for false narratives working so well.

Almost nobody is a private security system expert.

Almost nobody is an expert on the climate.

Almost nobody is an expert on high altitude weather balloons.

Almost nobody is an expert on virus's and vaccines.

Almost nobody is an expert on the way voting ballets are tabulated.

Sources can state whatever they want to, create false narratives and DISinformation using convincing sounding, complete bs because the targets don't know any better, despite the age of enlightening information available at our fingertips.

People are conditioned to get the quick answers handed to  them on a silver platter and to go with the ones that they WANT TO believe in from the same exact sources that they want to believe.

We've watched the best weather/climate for life on this planet in the last 1,000 years being turned into a climate crisis. A beneficial gas, CO2 that's greening up the planet and massively increasing food production.......is carbon pollution.

Death by Greening:

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/69258/