Never a better example of Dems political philosophy.
14 responses | 0 likes
Started by TimNew - May 5, 2022, 7:11 a.m.
Comments
By TimNew - May 5, 2022, 7:21 a.m.
Like Reply

And then theres Hillary.


"No. We just can't trust the American people to make those types of choices ... Government has to make those choices for people." – Hillary Clinton

By metmike - May 5, 2022, 8:52 a.m.
Like Reply

Thanks Tim,

the writing is on the wall this fall. When the republicans get control of noth houses, which seems extremely likely, Biden will be investigated for his REAL corruption related to Hunter AND he will be forced to take a cognitive test…..his doctors will come up with fake results If he fights back.

seems likely that they will try to impeach him but my money is on him resigning for health reasons before that happens.

God help us with Harris at the helm.

this hogwash about him still planning to run again in 2024 is the dumbest fake,political posturing I can remember in my long life.

even if his cerebral functions were ample, every aspect of his leadership is failing and though many things are outside of his control, his actions often make things worse like his E15 gas stunt.

that one is hall of fame counter productive, blunder-land from somebody that either doesn’t understand what it is that he just did or does understand and is trying to trick people to think it helps them or the situation.

his  ratings are extremely low for a good reason. He’s actually a very likeable guy, so it’s competence and failures and trust issues.

But we wouldn’t expect them to be honest about 2024 because it would mean acknowledging very bad realities.

By TimNew - May 5, 2022, 9:31 a.m.
Like Reply

If pubs do attempt to impeach, I hope they do an honest due diligence and build a fact based case.

I know I am biased,  but based on what I know so far, I think that it's entirely possible.

But the last thing this country needs is another faux impeachment. Election decisions should remain in the hands of the voters, no matter how much you dislike a candidate.

By mcfarm - May 5, 2022, 10:36 a.m.
Like Reply

when you think of libs I always remember this from Corinthians...."When I was a child I spake as a child"  After hearing Biden, Schummer and AOC and others they have left no doubt

By metmike - May 5, 2022, 3:08 p.m.
Like Reply

I agree Tim.

The republicans would have to make a case that Biden's obvious cognitive decline is a danger to our country.........it's a piece of cake to show his decline but it has to be a danger to our country.

Go no farther than this(the worst of his hundreds of gaffs):

 How Damaging is Biden's Gaff?            

                            10 responses |              

                Started by joj - March 27, 2022, 6:26 a.m.            

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/82777/


Previous discussion:

                Biden's cognitive decline            

                            15 responses |           

                Started by metmike - April 15, 2022, 4:13 a.m.            

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/83350/


If you add this below to it, they actually have the legit justification for impeaching Biden. They will probably do the investigation first to use the facts from it. 

Anybody that comes here, knows that  I'm an objective independent, not affiliated with either party, that just uses authentic facts and science as tools of discernment. There plenty of compelling facts below! This is why I think the republicans will have tons of ammo AFTER they do the investigation.

Since Biden knows what he did and may not be able to cover up reams of evidence forever(thanks to Hunter gifting the world with the laptop he lost during a drug induced blackout) ps-I had hundreds of alcohol black outs in my younger years and did some insane things to hurt myself and unintentionally other people, so I'm absolutely NOT judging the guy. Good for him in recovering. However, I am completely honest about me and took accountibility and for decades, have devoted my live to making the world a better place.......featuring HONESTY and ACCOUNTABILITY. Which is what this is about for the Biden's.......NOT judging.


                Bad news for the Biden's and their big corruption cover up            

                            14 responses |       

  Started by metmike - April 26, 2022, 9:18 p.m.        

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/83715/

                            

             

  Hunter Biden's numerous crimes being investigated            

                            5 responses |      

                Started by metmike - April 7, 2022, 9:56 p.m.  

          https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/83121/


Hunter back in the news            

                            9 responses |        

                Started by metmike - July 3, 2021, 3:25 a.m.            

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/71953/


More smoking gun evidence on Bidens            

                            78 responses |                1046 likes            

                                            Started by metmike - Oct. 14, 2020, 7:39 p.m.            

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/60077/

                                  


Personally, I would GREATLY prefer that Biden remain in office his entire term and not have Harris at the helm. 

The dems will be calling the shots. Whether he resigns or not. It's unlikely the republicans can get a 2/3rd majority in the senate to impeach Biden unless they can show some really bad stuff. So it might just be the house.........depends on the election 2022 results.

It can always backfire and cause people to think the Rs are being unfair to Biden but as an independent, they really do have the goods on him. 

The Rs will also ask if they want Harris as president. This could actually backfire......or help them.

The dems will be fuming if Biden is impeached and what if things start improving under Harris and she gets credit for it?

Then, she could run in 2024 with a lot of momentum and unite the party that wants to defeat the other party that impeached their person they last voted in as president.

That really COULD happen.

Lots of impossible to predict scenarios.


By metmike - May 5, 2022, 3:26 p.m.
Like Reply

Roe v. Wade and the future of reproductive rights in America


Democrats promise votes on abortion rights despite vanishingly small odds of success

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/05/1096636861/democrats-votes-abortion-rights

The NPR reporters in this story are frustrated that the D's have not been much more effective in their attempts to change the outcomes.

No mention about the horrendous ethics violation by the person that illegally released this private discussion.........just the frustration that its not enough to STOP THE SUPREME COURT because they are grateful to the criminal for trying to do that but it just wasn't/isn't  enough, they lament!

By mcfarm - May 5, 2022, 6:23 p.m.
Like Reply

npr should of been warned decades ago about their behavior. And if changes were not made {and they were not} then funding should of been pulled. Just today it was reported that home addresses of some {wonder which ones} of the supremes have been posted on social media. Sure no intimidation factor there.

By metmike - May 5, 2022, 9:34 p.m.
Like Reply

NPR is clearly left biased by I enjoy listening to them because they do have some wonderful topics and some great coverage.

I actually enjoy it when they discuss topics that I disagree with their position on, even when they express blatant bias.

These people exist. Blocking them out and not listening to them will cause you to miss out on a lot of good points(which they are loaded with too) and also, make it impossible to understand where they're coming from.

How can we sincerely disagree strongly with a group or person if all we do is listen to people that tell us stuff  from our side to reinforce what we think that we know?

That's called group think or brainwashing which is the opposite of independant, critical thinking. 

Do we want to let our side tell us the interpretation of what the other side says/thinks or do we want to sincerely listen to them ourselves with an open mind and figure it out ourselves based on the facts of BOTH sides?

This hear, is an example of just regurgitating DISinformation because OUR side told us and we believe everything THEY say without doing any objective fact checking to see if its really true or not:

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/84058/




By TimNew - May 6, 2022, 2:21 a.m.
Like Reply

It is wrong on many levels that a biased news source recieves federal funding. That the dems vehemently oppose any discussion on this gives one more insite into just who they are.

By mcfarm - May 6, 2022, 7:09 a.m.
Like Reply

mm, just why in the world would I want my tax dollars wasted on a bunch of libs who do not like this country, want most everything about this country changed including our form of government to some fake social/commy wacked out place that I would not recognize. All that so I can listen to the other side meanwhile they refuse to give an inch of fair coverage to the conservative side while blowing what is it....400M dollars of our money. Sure I will step right up for that opportunity, Maybe next week they will even report about the Hunter Biden lap top if we play nice with them just a little longer

By metmike - May 6, 2022, 9:56 a.m.
Like Reply

That’s perfectly fine if you choose to live that way, mcfarm.

the huge pitfall with that, however is that you NEVER can know when your side is completely wrong…..which DOES happen and when the other side is TOTALLY right.

We can pretend that our side is always right and live in a fantasy world.

I enjoy being able to pick and choose my rights and wrongs based on a case by case basis and using facts and truth as authentic discernment tools  vs one party telling me how to think On EVERYTHING.

By mcfarm - May 6, 2022, 11:31 a.m.
Like Reply

on the main, smaller gov, strong defense, protected boarders, lower taxes, less regulation, strong economy, and fuel independence seem to me to never be wrong. Sure there the details to fight about but to give pbs 400M for that info is folly. Founders would just have 1 more reason to roll in their graves thinking WTF are they doing. And that 400 number is from memory but what ever number it is, its too large

By metmike - May 6, 2022, 1:03 p.m.
Like Reply

I agree with you on those issues but you left out a ton of stuff........most social issues, 2020 election(because Rs lost), covid vaxx truths where the Rs totally twisted the authentic facts like a pretzel.

You can't know this because you accepted the twisted facts as indisputable truths from your side.

The only way to know, would be to see both sides.

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/77011/#77012

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/77011/#78919

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/77011/#79540

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/77011/#80517

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/77011/#81477

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/82252/

            

mcfarm,

I'm not doing this for free because I don't have anything better to do. I'm trying to generously share authentic values that everybody can relate to on all sides of the corrupted political spectrum in order for them to be better human beings.

Discerned, spending a tremendous amount of time to be certain it represents objective truths using authentic facts, science and an honorable code of ethics.....to the best of my ability.

Nobody can make others believe it.

Nobody can make others embrace it any of it.

But you know in your heart it's true and its being sincerely gifted to anyone here with open arms. 

I'm also extremely flawed in several areas and still have lots to learn(from others and  from doing independent research) and would like to think of it as somebody who realizes that he still DOESN'T know MUCH more than he knows(which really is true)  and loves every day of learning new things and wants to multiply that learning....for the sake of learning..... by enthusiastically sharing it with as many people as possible.

This is the main reason for me to be here mcfarm.

I strongly suspect that my existence as moderator here (and in several other incredible personal realms-like coaching 3,700 young people in chess-which just fell into my lap in 1997- and miraculous things have happened the past 3 decades because I had an open mind/heart to spiritual messages that must have come from Divine Providence.

Since Divine Providence is based mostly on faith, not provable facts or science, I can only speculate and can't prove it. Regardless, too many wonderful blessings, some with incredibly miniscule odds have happened to me to not strongly speculate this as a major force.

By metmike - May 6, 2022, 10:09 p.m.
Like Reply

  What Is a Bullish Abandoned Baby?  

The bullish abandoned baby is a type of candlestick pattern that is used by traders to signal a reversal of a downtrend. It forms in a downtrend and is composed of three price bars. The first is a large down candle, followed by a doji candle that gaps below the first candle. The next candle opens higher than the doji and moves aggressively to the upside.

Bullish Abandoned Baby Pattern

Image