metmike: The massive benefits to increasing CO2 in agriculture, easily outweigh the small negatives in the 6 other metrics. When viewed as a cumulative measure from all contributions combined, we get a strong positive/benefit, denoted by the pink line on the 2nd graph below.....which goes out to the year 2200.
These results were obtained by using the FUND model:
This was the latest global temperature:
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/68838/
May 2nd, 2021 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.
Here are some of the 3 dozen+ discussions from metmike based on authentic science, empirical data/observations and most elements related to the fake climate crisis.
Climate Reality discussions 2 additions-April 2021
Started by metmike - April 15, 2019, 4:10 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/27864/
The reason to show you this stuff above is on the next page.
https://gizmodo.com/top-climate-scientist-blasts-government-lab-after-denie-1846956716
"Ben Santer, one of the nation’s leading climate scientists, said he is cutting ties with a prestigious government-funded laboratory over its plans to invite a scientist who has spread climate denial to speak in a seminar.
In his statement, Santer didn’t mince words, alleging that Koonin is “not an authoritative voice on climate science” and that LLNL management had not adequately responded to Santer’s concerns about the seminar, which was scheduled to be held on May 27.
“Differing technical opinions are part of the scientific process,” a spokesperson for LLNL told Earther in an email. “Throughout its history the Lab has invited guest speakers whose opinions differ from those of the Lab and its workforce. It does not mean the Lab endorses those opinions. The Lab has a long and distinguished history in groundbreaking climate research — the Lab continues to advance and stand by that research.”
Koonin, a physics professor who worked at BP in the mid-2000s and who now is at NYU, is one of those dangerous figures who plays up the whataboutism that has plagued the conversation around climate science for decades. While he technically accepts the fact that humans are exerting some influence on the climate—which, in his opinion, does not make him a “climate denier”—his beef is with just how bad it’s going to be. These viewpoints—and the fact that he worked briefly in the Department of Energy under President Barack Obama—have made him a favorite among those who seek to further discredit climate science"
metmike: What this powerful climate scientist is stating in crystal clear fashion, is that he wants any opposing views to his mainstream climate crisis narrative to be completely censored. Only his views and those of scientists that agree with him about us having a climate crisis can be allowed!
This is an outrage because its the 100% polar opposite of practicing the scientific method(which welcomes skeptism, debate and transparency... forces you to prove your theory-not just decree it and tell everyone to accept it because you are smarter than them).
Sadly, it's also defined climate science over the last decade and is only getting worse.as the climate crisis case is completely falling apart from data that is proving it more and more busted.
The response is to silence those with that data.
In other words, if anybody tried to bring metmike in to talk about the authentic science, using nothing but accurate, measured data and 100% authentic science, this guy and many others would object to it and try to stop/block it because my views do not conform with/support the fake climate crisis narrative.