Such a good soap, you don't need HBO
11 responses | 0 likes
Started by cfdr - Dec. 30, 2017, 10:27 a.m.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/12/30/breaking-senator-lindsey-graham-just-confirmed-the-steele-dossier-was-used-for-2016-fisa-warrant/


This is just so fascinating - watching this unfold is much better than any fiction on HBO.

Mueller must be frantic to find something on Trump or his family.  His whole investigation appears to be based on an illegal FISA warrant financed by Hillary/the DNC - most of which appears to have been fabricated by the Russians and used to get warrants to wiretap their opponents campaign.

If a good number of Obama officials along with FBI and DOJ personnel do not go to jail, it will either be because Mueller can get the Mexican standoff he so desperately needs, or, Jeff Sessions not wanting to investigate a previous administration convinces the president to let it slide.

Like the author of this article says:

" You’ve… just…. got… to… be… kidding… right?"

This is finally even forcing its way into CNN's coverage:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/12/29/curiously-missing-cnn-op-ed-supportive-of-president-trump-mysteriously-appears-two-days-later/

"However, then Mr. Callen broke the cardinal rule, he actually did some investigating of the claims he was criticizing.  To CNN’s horror, Paul Callen came away from his research with an evolved and informed position that Trump was right, and his detractors were wrong."

The look on Poppy Harlow's face is priceless in this interview.


I don't think there are enough crows to feed everyone who needs to eat!

Comments
By mojo - Dec. 30, 2017, 11:33 a.m.
Like Reply

There is nothing illegal or conspiratorial about the DOJ or FBI using the Steele Dossier as an excuse to obtain a FISA warrant to investigate Trump. BTW, this so-called 'bombshell" is old news. All of this was discussed on CNN 4 or 5 months ago. Breitbart would have you believe that this is some kind of a bombshell revelation, but it isn't. So, back to the drawing board, and better luck next time.

By cfdr - Dec. 30, 2017, 11:59 a.m.
Like Reply

mojo, you are so far down the rabbit hole you don't even know that you are down in a rabbit hole.

Just look at the expression and reaction of Poppy Harlow.  This was not what she was expecting.  The guy was previously denigrating Trump, but when he investigated himself, he apparently wanted to go on record saying Trump was right.

"There is nothing illegal or conspiratorial about the DOJ or FBI using the Steele Dossier as an excuse to obtain a FISA warrant to investigate Trump."

Wow.  Just - - Wow.  Hillary and the DNC give money to the Russians who come up with a salacious "dossier" on Trump that the FBI even said they tried very hard to verify but couldn't - and this "dossier" is used by elements in the DOJ and FBI to get a FISA warrant to wiretap Hillary's opponent in the presidential race - and you say that " There is nothing illegal or conspiratorial "??  

Be careful, mojo.  The tsunami is about to hit, and you don't want to get caught this deep in the rabbit hole!

By TimNew - Dec. 30, 2017, 1:04 p.m.
Like Reply

What's really entertaining here, is that Mojo,  like most on the left, were ready to skewer Trump on unsubstantiated hearsay, which, if proven true, would be far less serious than the actions he's defending above..


But,  I guess lib-dem collusion, even on a scale that borders or exceed criminal statutes and possible includes criminal conspiracy is somehow defined differently than pub collusion.


We're all partisan to some extent, but this example goes far beyond partisan, very likely beyond simple delusion.

By mojo - Dec. 30, 2017, 2:30 p.m.
Like Reply

That's total  bull poop. Hillary & the DNC did not give money to Russia for dirt on Trump. They hired a research firm, Fusion GPS, to do opposition research on Trump. Everybody that's been following all this knows that. It's perfectly legal, all campaigns have been doing that forever. Take your bull poop and spread it somewhere else. I can understand why you like Trump, you spread lies just like he does.

By cfdr - Dec. 30, 2017, 4:20 p.m.
Like Reply

"That's total  bull poop. Hillary & the DNC did not give money to Russia for dirt on Trump. They hired a research firm, Fusion GPS, to do opposition research on Trump. Everybody that's been following all this knows that. It's perfectly legal, all campaigns have been doing that forever. Take your bull poop and spread it somewhere else. I can understand why you like Trump, you spread lies just like he does."


Do you just not read, mojo, or do you have a reading problem?

Hillary hired Fusion GPS to do "opposition research."

Fusion GPS hires Nellie Ohr, wife of DOJ Deputy Bruce Ohr, who subcontracted Christopher Steele who pays the Russians for, to this day, unsubstantiated salacious dirt on Donald Trump.

So, money from Hillary Clinton goes to the Russians for a "dossier" that, even the FBI said they tried very hard to verify - but couldn't.

Now, are you following to this point, mojo?  This is where it gets interesting.

This never substantiated "dirt" on Donald Trump was then used by Peter Strzok, Bruce Ohr and DOJ Attorney Lisa Page to apply for a FISA warrant to wiretap Donald Trump.

Now, don't let me lose you here, mojo.

Hillary Clinton pays for a never substantiated "dossier" that members of both the DOJ and the FBI use to get a warrant to wiretap Hillary's opponent in the presidential election.

And, you say "nothing to see here - move on"??

Get out of that deep rabbit hole - there is a tsunami coming, and you will be drowning soon.

By cfdr - Dec. 30, 2017, 11:51 a.m.
Like Reply

There have been unexplained problems with the site.  Personally, it is the only link I have ever had disappear from my bookmarks.

Try these - I'll just copy/paste the link address  from the main site rather than go to the link first.


https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/12/30/breaking-senator-lindsey-graham-just-confirmed-the-steele-dossier-was-used-for-2016-fisa-warrant/

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/12/29/curiously-missing-cnn-op-ed-supportive-of-president-trump-mysteriously-appears-two-days-later/


If that does not work, go to the main site:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/

and read "Breaking: Senator Lindsey Graham . . .

and "Curiously missing CNN  . . .


If those don't work, simply search for "theconservativetreehouse.com"

By cfdr - Dec. 30, 2017, 12:03 p.m.
Like Reply

Maybe I need to get out my tinfoil hat.  I am wondering if someone wants to shut that site down.

A test - I'll try this:

https://tinyurl.com/y85q96c5

https://tinyurl.com/y8wewp8g


OK, those work.  Just out of curiosity, compare the addresses with the links provided in the previous posts.  Why should these work but not the original ones?

By JP - Dec. 30, 2017, 1:27 p.m.
Like Reply

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/12/30/breaking-senator-lindsey-graham-just-confirmed-the-steele-dossier-was-used-for-2016-fisa-warrant/

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/12/29/curiously-missing-cnn-op-ed-supportive-of-president-trump-mysteriously-appears-two-days-later/

Clicking on the links in your originating post leads to a "page not found" apology at the site; however, copying and pasting the addresses "as is" into the address bar works fine! The addresses above are identical to the ones you first posted except that the "s" in "https" has been removed. Generally I delete it as it frequently makes links that don't work. I am curious to see if these will.

===================================================================================================

Update: No those links don't work either, still leading to a page not found apology. But copying and pasting them into the browser works fine! Go figure.


By JP - Dec. 30, 2017, 1:39 p.m.
Like Reply

Well, that's interesting: I have to highlight the text in my previous

post to be able to read it, as it spills out of the box and into the

green border.  I previously thought this was due to

posting images, but apparently not -- if there are enough

replies to posts in a thread, it looks as though this will happen.

I am manually shortening my sentences to avoid the

overlap.


It's too bad there isn't someone keeping tabs on the site to

note when issues like this (or other problems)  crop up.

Someone like, oh, I don't know... a moderator? 

By cfdr - Dec. 30, 2017, 4:25 p.m.
Like Reply

JP - it isn't this site.  I sent those links to a couple of friends too - with the same results.  It appears that there might be something suspicious happening, as it isn't only me.

I tried replying to your last post - no luck.

I'll try with the one previous to that one.