quite a shock. wonder where the clintons were? The Mueller family asks for pirvacy during this tough time. What gull. They sure as hell had no problem illegally raping Trump's privacy illegally or hell just about any other human who knew Trump.
Always thought it was odd when he was called testify about all his illegal activates. MM takes great pains to elaborate from 10,ooo miles away that Trump's brain is gone and on and on. Remember when Mueller was called and he sat there for hours not knowing much of a single detail of his own investigation and the millions upon millions he wasted. And as it turns out the GD FBI knew the details before the investigation....again with libs and history....so odd, so very odd.
May Robert Mueller rest in peace. He will be remembered for doing a lot for the FBI as its dignified director in addition to his two years of hard work as Special Counsel. He was a great American.
Have to agree strongly with mcfarm!
more actual evidence of The Hoax
Started by mcfarm - July 19, 2025, 10 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/113315/
++++++++++++++++
More Mueller corruption!
Started by metmike - Sept. 11, 2020, 6:44 p.m.
+++++++++++++++++++++++
You can't get any more offensive than Donald Trump!
I hope the complete opposite for Donald Trump. So he can live long enough to experience the disgrace of being removed from office.
Thanks, Mike.
Looking back at the first post of one of the old threads you just linked us to (another thread started by mc) was this 7/18/25 video linked below, which echoes what y’all are saying about it being a hoax. But when you get to ~8:45 into it (please listen to that part as it’s only 4 minutes long and crucial to the point I’m making), the podcaster says that “we’re learning why Trump was acting so weird about it (the Epstein story) because he knew the entire week what was happening that the WSJ was planning to release this ridiculous smear-job, this silly personal birthday letter story which Trump told us about this morning on Truth Social….he told Rupert Murdoch do not run this story it was fake I did not write that letter….”, which lead to DT suing the WSJ because he still ran it.
Mike, don’t you blatantly disagree with what this podcaster is saying regarding the Birthday Letter? I’m not saying that what you and mc are insisting about Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Obama, Hillary, etc. can’t be true. (Regardless, Brennan sounded pretty convincing about his feelings about the Iran War, which I posted on this board as you know.). But assuming you totally disagree with what’s in the video post 8:45, how can anything this podcaster said have any credibility, whatsoever? Didn’t he ruin his credibility as a podcaster by agreeing with Trump that the birthday letter was a “smear job”?
Also, I’ll reiterate that the timing of this last summer strongly wreaks of intentional distraction from Epstein stuff:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LxZugJliwbY&pp=0gcJCZoBo7VqN5tD
Larry I challenge you to provide one iota of documentation that Mueller did "hard work" Hell the guy was nearly as impaired as Biden
Thanks, Larry!
Chance of the birthday letter being authentic?
99.9999%!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Epstein files
By metmike - Feb. 18, 2026, 9:36 p.m.
mc said:
Larry I challenge you to provide one iota of documentation that Mueller did "hard work" Hell the guy was nearly as impaired as Biden
———-
Hey mc,
I was assuming he worked hard on this for 2 years. But I don’t have documentation. We know his testimony sounded awful. I don’t know why. I’m guessing that perhaps Parkinson’s was already affecting him despite that diagnosis apparently coming afterward (2021).
If you mean he had become nearly as cognitively impaired as Biden by the time of the testimony, do you have proof? He looked bad, but perhaps it was largely due to physical reasons related to Parkinson’s? That terrible disease causes major speaking problems, which can be mistaken for cognitive impairment.
Mike said:
“Thanks, Larry!
Chance of the birthday letter being authentic?
99.9999%!”
————-
Thanks, Mike. With us in agreement on this, then how can what that podcaster said before 8:45 on the video be at all trusted? Any credibility for being objective is shot imho.
Ok, thanks, Larry!